8/3/2023 0 Comments Gen 4 ejector![]() ![]() The Melonite process presumably results in a more durable finish compared to the previous Tenifer process for better corrosion resistance on the slide’s surface. FINISHĪnother new feature that distinguishes Gen 4 pistols from previous-gen Glocks is its finish. The company uses a newer salt-bath ferritic-nitrocarburizing finishing process which Glock aficionados refer to as Melonite. The company has finally acknowledged the way Glock owners label their pistols as far as generational improvements.Īll Gen 4 models now have a “Gen 4” stamp laser-etched on their slides just next to the model number, making them easily distinguishable from previous-generation Glock pistols. And the first thing people noticed with these pistols is for the first time, they all bear the Gen4 mark on the slide. Maybe you’ll find info to help you decide whether or not the Gen 4 you’re eyeing will fit your needs. If you’re in the same situation I’m in and you’re torn between any previous generation Glocks and their Gen 4 counterparts, read on. Today, we’re taking a look at the problems commonly associated with Gen 4 Glock pistols in general. The adage “you can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs” rings so true here. I’ve heard from friends that Gen 4 Glocks have a lot of significant improvements over previous-generation designs, but with those inevitably came unwelcome changes. But I know somehow that stamp isn’t just for show. They’re chambered for the same caliber too, and except for the latter version having a stamp on the slide that says Gen 4, they look and feel the same. If you’re looking to for a different model, check out our Glock 17 vs. Both are enticing offers - but even if I had money to spare, I’m not sure I’d want one over the other. My local LGS is selling a Glock 17 Gen 3 for $400 and a Glock 17 Gen 4 for $450. I’ve always had a dislike for plastic guns.īut being the true blue handgun enthusiast that I am, and being a guy who likes to try something new from time to time like all red-blooded men do, especially when that something is being sold at a bargain, I recently took a passing interest in a Gen 4 Glock 17. Having lived in the suburbs for a little under a decade now and working from home, I’ve never felt the need to get a smaller piece for concealed carry, much less one made of plastic. I’ve never felt inadequate with what I have: a gunsmith-tuned Norc commander 1911 in. ![]() I think this is a parts problem, with some recent QC fail and internal shufflings on Glock's part being the likely culprit.As many of you who have read my written articles know by now, I’ve always been an all-steel handgun guy. I've seen lots of gen 4's (including my own) run like glockwork. I'm not going to go so far as to argue that the Gen 4 issues are frame flex induced. Couldn't we take your argument to its logical conclusion then and state that it's possible the design of the gen 4's is fundamentally flawed? Since there is subtle difference in the way the frame flexes depending on which hand you're shooting from, there may be a correlation between problem pistols and shooter handedness.Oy, that doesn't fill me with a particularly high degree of confidence. I am curious if there is a different reliability experience in right- vs. It might just be a simple case of tolerance stacking in the part dimensions as well as the polymer formula. Earlier models may have looser tolerances because there isn't so much stuff jammed into the new grip on the Gen4. When Glock changed the grip and trigger housing, it seems they may have misjudged the amount of material needed to maintain the dimensional stability of those parts under recoil.īut, what causes some Gen4s to run while others have ejection problems? Could be that some batches of the frame polymer are a hair stiffer or even softer. JHC- This is a guess, but I'd say all the Gen4 problems come down to flex in the Gen4 frame. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |